Listen to the Article
There's a principle embedded in the Constitution that's been abandoned almost entirely. Federalism. The idea that power should be distributed, that the federal government has limited authority, and that most decisions should be made at state and local levels.
The Founders didn't invent this by accident. They thought about it deeply. They'd watched what happens when power concentrates. They'd lived under a centralized government that overreached. So they built a system where power is divided. Federal government handles certain things. States handle everything else. That's the structure.
But over the past hundred years, that structure collapsed. Power flowed to Washington. Authority centralized. Federal bureaucracies expanded. And now we have a government that's distant, unaccountable, and constantly making one-size-fits-all decisions for three-hundred-thirty million people with wildly different needs and circumstances.
How We Got Here
For much of American history, federalism mostly worked. Yes, violations occurred. Yes, power occasionally overreached. But the basic structure held. The federal government stuck to what the Constitution authorized. States handled local governance. Education, commerce, criminal law, social policy—states decided. Federal authority was genuinely limited.
Then the twentieth century happened. The New Deal expanded federal power. Wars required centralization. Civil rights legislation appropriately addressed legitimate failures by individual states. Each expansion came with reasonable arguments. And gradually, citizens got accustomed to looking to Washington first for solutions.
Something was lost. As power shifted to Washington, states lost autonomy. Elected representatives became further removed from the people they served. Bureaucrats who've never been to your state write rules affecting your daily life. You can't vote them out. You can't challenge them. You can't hold them accountable. They're insulated from consequences.
Why Federalism Actually Matters
Let me explain this clearly. Federalism isn't some abstract constitutional theory. It's a practical framework for organizing government in a way that protects liberty and actually serves people better.
First, subsidiarity. That's the principle that decisions should be made at the level of government closest to the affected people. A school board in Arizona understands Arizona children better than bureaucrats in DC. A state legislature understands its citizens better than federal agencies. This isn't controversial. It's common sense.
When decisions are made closer to people, several things happen. First, accountability. You can actually influence your city council. You can attend a town hall. You can see results from political engagement. Federal bureaucracies? Unreachable. You can't affect them. You can't remove them. That's a problem.
Second, tailoring to local circumstances. What works in rural Montana doesn't work in urban New Jersey. Federal policy treats everywhere the same. State policy can adapt. That's not just more efficient. That's more effective. That's smarter governance.
Third, competition. When states have authority, they compete. They experiment with different approaches. Some work. Some don't. Successful states get copied. Failed approaches get abandoned. It's like free-market governance. Natural selection of good policies. You can actually see what works.
Fourth, liberty protection. The Founders understood that concentrated power threatens freedom. By dividing power, they created institutional checks. If federal authority is limited, and you disagree with federal policy, you can move to a state where policy aligns with your values. Try doing that with Washington.
The Problem With Centralization
Imagine you're a small manufacturer in Ohio. You've built something over twenty years. You employ forty people. You're profitable. You're contributing to your community. Then a federal regulation comes down from the EPA. It was written for Fortune 500 companies. It applies to you. You have to hire someone just to manage compliance. You can't afford it. You let people go or close down. That's happening right now to small businesses everywhere. Federal regulations written without understanding local circumstances.
Or you're a teacher. Washington passes an education mandate. It sounds good in theory. But it doesn't match your community's needs or your students' circumstances. You have to implement it anyway. Your flexibility is gone. Your professionalism is constrained. You're managing federal requirements instead of educating children. That's happening too.
When power is centralized, a few people make decisions affecting millions. Bad decisions compound. There's no escape valve. There's no alternative policy to try. You're stuck with whatever Washington decided.
And here's what I didn't fully appreciate until I thought it through. Centralized power attracts corruption and special interests. If one federal rule affects the entire nation, that rule is worth millions of dollars to influence. Lobbyists swarm. They write the regulations. They shape policy. Federalism reduces that incentive. A state law affects only that state. It's worth less to corrupt. Natural check on corruption.
How Federalism Solves Modern Problems
Take education. The Constitution doesn't grant Washington authority over education. Yet the Department of Education influences schools nationwide. A federalist approach returns education to states and localities. States maintain standards. Set baselines. But decisions about curriculum, teaching methods, budget priorities—those stay local. Schools compete. Good ones attract families. Bad ones don't. Excellence emerges through competition. Parents have actual voice. Teachers have flexibility. This doesn't mean abandoning standards. It means holding people locally accountable instead of to federal mandates.
Healthcare. Rather than national mandates, states experiment. Some regulate heavily. Others favor market approaches. We actually learn what works. We don't impose one failed approach nationwide.
Criminal justice. States understand their crime patterns. Their needs are different. Federalism means states have primary authority. Federal guidance is fine. Federal funding incentives work. But Washington doesn't dictate exactly how New York polices New York. States can innovate. They can address local problems effectively.
Environmental regulation. Some issues are genuinely interstate. Pollution flowing across state lines. Federal action makes sense there. But local environmental conditions differ dramatically. What's appropriate regulation in one place is counterproductive elsewhere. Federalism allows for local solutions to local problems while addressing genuinely national concerns through federal authority.
This isn't anti-government. It's pro-accountability. It's pro-local decision-making. It's recognizing that the people closest to a problem usually understand it better than distant bureaucrats.
Reclaiming Federalism Requires Courage
To reclaim federalism, we need to do something difficult. We need to trust state and local governments more. We need to empower them. We need to limit federal authority to what the Constitution actually authorizes.
This means questioning federal programs. Does the Constitution authorize this? If not, should states handle it? It means electing representatives who actually understand constitutional limits and respect them. It means being willing to admit that Washington doesn't have all the answers. Sometimes it has very few.
It also means trusting the process of federalism. If some states implement policies you disagree with, that's not a failure. That's federalism working. It's not your job to make every state do what you think is right. It's your job to make sure your state does. If Massachusetts wants to pursue one policy and Texas wants to pursue another, let them. See which works. Learn from each other.
Why This Matters for America
Federalism is fundamentally about the relationship between power and liberty. Concentrated power threatens freedom. Distributed power, checked and balanced, protects it.
We've gotten used to Washington being the answer to every problem. But that approach has given us sprawling bureaucracies, one-size-fits-all policies that rarely fit anyone well, and government increasingly distant from the people it serves. It's also made corruption more effective and made it harder for citizens to impact policy.
Reclaiming federalism means trusting states and communities more. It means having the courage to experiment with different approaches. It means admitting that federal solutions aren't always superior. Sometimes they're inferior. Sometimes they're counterproductive.
A truly limited federal government, operating within constitutional bounds and respecting state and local authority, isn't a retreat from governance. It's a smarter approach. It's more accountable. It's more effective. And it actually protects the liberty that the Constitution was designed to preserve.
That's the promise of federalism. That's what we need to reclaim.
